Hi chris -- thanks for your frank exposition.  For a little background on
the idea of the "fortune at the bottom of the pyramid," you might be
interested to read CK Prahalad's book by the same title,
http://www.changemakers.net/library/temp/fortunepyramid.cfm

The idea of "eradicating poverty through profits" is not a western, top-down
concept, but actually one begun by visionaries like Muhammed Yunus of
Grameen Bank (http://www.grameen-info.org/).

I think that what the fortune magazine reflects is a powerful convergence in
thinking, not a vertically integrated scam.  The idea is that the power of
networks, made global through ICTs, has tremendous power to increase the
individual's capacity to create, ultimately to create wealth.  Efforts like
Grameen's Village Phone
(http://www.gfusa.org/technology_center/village_phone/) demonstrate how
income can be a motivator to bring the poor into a relationship with a
technology reseller.  Everyone, in theory, benefits.

I'm not sure what the success rates are with technology donation projects,
but it seems to me that if you make appropriate technologies available to
people in ways that increase their level of ownership the better that
technology will be used.  I know that is an oversimplification, but I don't
have a moral problem with the equation -- affordable access is the critical
factor.

Have a look at the links if you aren't already familiar with the initiatives
and let me know what you think.

lars
--
lars hasselblad torres
art + technology + democracy

http://tagstudio.net


On 2/16/05 6:49 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Now, with respect to this article, my heart skipped a few beats. I can say
> in the least that it is a bad article and i wonder if i could actually
> write something up for Forune some day soon in the future :-) J/K, and at
> the most, i hope the author misunderstood some things (or i did) and i
> really hope that simply "bringing technology to the developing world"
> isn't really the approach they are taking. Unfortunately though, I already
> do know that it is and it's a strong movement all across the world;
> however i would imagine it is more often to be found as an initiative in
> the top of the chain of economic and political power, not at the bottom
> except where the people have been convinced that it is "better for them"
> this way. This is one problem, or might i say, doubt, hesitation or
> sceptisism that i have towards the idea of "bridging the Digital Divide."

_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.

Reply via email to