On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:34, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote: > dsimcha wrote: >> >> I thought (I'm not 100% sure on either of these counts) that: >> >> 1. We don't want anything in Phobos that requires attribution for works >> distributed exclusively in binary form, even if the license is otherwise >> permissive. This means we can't use BSD-licensed code in Phobos. > > Right. > >> 2. Creative commons isn't entirely clear about whether attribution would >> be >> required for stuff distributed in pure binary form. > > Hmm. That would be a problem. >
I would assume only the documentation is cc-licensed, as far as I can remember all of Go was released using the MIT license or similar. -- Anders Bergh
