Am 06.11.2012 18:17, schrieb Walter Bright:> On 11/6/2012 9:06 AM,
deadalnix wrote:> Le 06/11/2012 16:15, Walter Bright a écrit :
> >> On 11/6/2012 5:14 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> >>> Hmmm, it didn't work on the most important place for my use case,
> >>> function
> >>> parameters:
> >>
> >> It didn't occur to me to enable that.
> >>
> >
> > It should work everywhere or not work at all.
>
> You can't have @pure attributes on function parameters, either.
Parameters don't
> work like regular declarations, never have, and I don't know of a
language where
> they do. They even have a different grammar.
>
but why should an UDA only extend the semantic of regular declarations?
can't you please give us a bad-usage example why it is/should be
forbidden to use UDA on parameters (and please - we are not talking
about pure, in, out and stuff like that)
