On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 20:41:27 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 11/06/2012 07:02 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/6/2012 9:34 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
can't you please give us a bad-usage example why it is/should
be
forbidden to
use UDA on parameters (and please - we are not talking about
pure, in,
out and
stuff like that)
I believe this is the wrong question. For a new feature, the
question
should be "why should it be included", not "why shouldn't it
be included."
...
The same holds for arbitrary restrictions.
I thought the general agreement was to include the feature.
Language features should be as general and as orthogonal as
possible and reasonable.
Exactly. Looking forward to complaints about impossibility to
annotate module declarations.
