On 11/06/2012 07:02 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/6/2012 9:34 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
can't you please give us a bad-usage example why it is/should be
forbidden to
use UDA on parameters (and please - we are not talking about pure, in,
out and
stuff like that)
I believe this is the wrong question. For a new feature, the question
should be "why should it be included", not "why shouldn't it be included."
...
The same holds for arbitrary restrictions.
I thought the general agreement was to include the feature.
Language features should be as general and as orthogonal as possible and
reasonable.
