Le 07/11/2012 09:23, Don Clugston a écrit :
If you mean, we should be working on getting the existing stuff working before we think about adding more stuff, I agree 100%.
That is a good part of my point. The other part being that surprise feature dropped in master, not only impair stability, but also impair the ability for developing tooling around D.
My problem isn't the feature itself. I'm all for annotation. But the way it is added in the language make nonsense and is even dangerous for D.
I would say we're about three years away from it being sensible to work on annotations. It's reasonable to draft a preliminary proposal (A roadmap, what a novel concept!). But I think it would be a big mistake to do much work on it.
Exactly. And propose the feature in an experimental branch or something before pushing it to master, so people can test it, it can be refined as needed and 3rd party tool can adapt to it.
