On 2013-09-26 13:12, Dicebot wrote:
I was saying that if you want to have some tests independent, it makes much more sense to do it this way:``` @test("foo") unittest { assert(1 == 1); } @test("bar") unittest { assert(1 == 2); } ``` ..and let tests within one block terminate on first failure. That should integrate better with existing tooling when no external testing library/framework is connected.
Exactly. I guess I misunderstood you. Although I would consider "having lot of small independent annotated unit-test blocks" be basically what you're showing above.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
