On 2013-09-26 13:12, Dicebot wrote:
I was saying that if you want to have some tests independent, it makes
much more sense to do it this way:
assert(1 == 1);
assert(1 == 2);
..and let tests within one block terminate on first failure. That should
integrate better with existing tooling when no external testing
library/framework is connected.
Exactly. I guess I misunderstood you. Although I would consider "having
lot of small independent annotated unit-test blocks" be basically what
you're showing above.