Am 06.12.2013 20:10, schrieb Jakob Ovrum: > On Friday, 6 December 2013 at 18:55:22 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> On Friday, 6 December 2013 at 18:40:59 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote: >>> It has been said already in this thread, but for library targets it >>> must ignore the lack of a "main source file". It should go without >>> saying that libraries generally don't have such a thing. >> >> It adding such requirement for static libraries much of an issue? It >> provides quite lot of advantages. Though I guess dub can possibly >> generate such file on its own. > > It's unreasonable for Dub to require users to change the structure of > their project, or add boilerplate to their project, for something as > fundamental as building a simple static library.
Just to get the facts straight, building a static library works without a main file, just not when "--rdmd" is used. The only thing added in the beta was the warning message.
