Am 06.12.2013 20:10, schrieb Jakob Ovrum:
> On Friday, 6 December 2013 at 18:55:22 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Friday, 6 December 2013 at 18:40:59 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
>>> It has been said already in this thread, but for library targets it
>>> must ignore the lack of a "main source file". It should go without
>>> saying that libraries generally don't have such a thing.
>> It adding such requirement for static libraries much of an issue? It
>> provides quite lot of advantages. Though I guess dub can possibly
>> generate such file on its own.
> It's unreasonable for Dub to require users to change the structure of
> their project, or add boilerplate to their project, for something as
> fundamental as building a simple static library.
Just to get the facts straight, building a static library works without
a main file, just not when "--rdmd" is used. The only thing added in the
beta was the warning message.