On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:16:42 -0800, Robert <jfanati...@gmx.at> wrote:

Thank you Dicebot for stepping up. Unfortunately the demand seems to be very, very low, so I believe we are going to stick with the old std.signals.

Thanks again!

Best regards,


Which is a shame too. We could have definitely used this in Aurora... But I think Andrei's comments kind of nixed the discussion. :-S

On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 13:51:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 09:11:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos proposal (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org). It have not received much feedback and I was a it too busy to proceed with final voting at that moment but with no outstanding issues to address nothing prevents that final step.

Let's put 2 week deadline to refresh memories about the proposal and make some decision. Voting closes at January 20th 23:59 GMT 0

Please take some time and help make Phobos better ;)

Less than 10 hours are left.

Adam Wilson
GitHub/IRC: LightBender
Aurora Project Coordinator

Reply via email to