On 20/05/14 20:56, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
There weren't really any alpha/beta/rc states for any of that. Neither
formally nor informally. Back then, everything was all just "if it's
good enough for you, then go ahead and use it". The stability was more
of an ever-progressing (and occasionally regressing) gradient.
Also, 0.x -> 1.x was only an arbitrary "line in the sand". Version 1.000
was just simply the name of the next regular release after 0.1xx
(whatever the "xx" would have been, don't recall offhand). The 1.000
moniker was more PR than technical.
Similarly, version 2.000 was just simply the next "mainline" release
after it was decided to fork off a separate "no more breaking changes"
branch (which is what 1.x *became* when 2.000 was released).
It was all definitely very much *not* "semantic versioning".
Yeah, and it still continues with the same model. Although, we have had
a few alphas and betas of individual releases.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
