On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 23:07:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Some of the inconsistencies you mentioned and Brian mentioned in his talk are actually the result of consistencies.

I know this is a bit of a difficult thing to wrap one's head around, but having something be mathematically consistent and humanly consistent are often at severe odds.

Could you elaborate? Using some of the examples Brian gave, which ones do you think are are mathematically consistent/human inconsistent and which the inverse?

Reply via email to