On Sunday, 23 November 2014 at 19:36:16 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
For more D features I would add a thin layer on top of the raw
bindings. Like creating wrappers for functions accepting C
strings and have them accept D strings instead.
Yes, I think, there should be more layers, more D-ish
constructions, but on top of binding, not inside it. I think, it
could be more useful for someone who is not satisfied by existing
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 00:40:39 UTC, Colden Cullen wrote:
Of course, I want to register it, but I think it should be a part
of Derelict Project, not unofficial binding. What should I do to
On Saturday, 22 November 2014 at 12:32:50 UTC, Lodin wrote:
This looks great! I plan on using it to build a diet plugin,
just like Martin's coffee-script plugin. Any chance you
could register it on the Dub Registry though? It would make
using this a lot easier.
And one thing about the diet plugin. I plan to make thin wrapper
around binding to simplify using. Something like `sassc` which
allows using libsass from console with options. Of course, it
should be useful like a library too. Is the diet plugin a same
thing? Or should it be the next layer around wrapper?