On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:41:12 UTC, Tomer Rosenschtein
wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:31:19 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tomer Rosenschtein:
Awesome article.
"Paper of the week" is a modest word for this.
The D code is not good.
Bye,
bearophile
Maybe not good by the standards of this group, but it does
represent the efforts of someone doing 'real work', so I think
it is worthwhile.
I would bet that 'in the wild' there is a lot more D code that
looks like that than what might be considered good, idiomatic
D.
Craig
I understand why D is still underground.The guy use R, by
miracle he suddently test a strong typed-compiled-lang and he
concludes: "well, those compiled lang seem interesting...".
Then Someone post this here, on reddit, on HackerNews...
And Miracle!
Everybody thinks it's awesome.
Common...
You're the one that called it awesome! I don't think anyone here
was overly excited about it, but we are always happy to see D get
good press.
Maybe the guy the wrote the article is just an average
programmer, but hey most of the programmers in the world are
average programmers - so this article could appeal to that
segment of the market.
