Nick Treleaven, el 19 de February a las 17:25 me escribiste: > On 19/02/2015 17:00, Nick Treleaven wrote: > >>>Alternatively std.typetuple.TypeTuple can be used instead of let > >> > >>not for ranges and arrays though > > > >Yes, but `tuple` overloads could be added for those. > > Or not - the length isn't known at compile-time. > > >Tuple already > >supports construction from a static array: > > > > int a, b; > > TypeTuple!(a, b) = Tuple!(int, int)([3, 4]); > > I'm hacking std.typecons so this does work: > > TypeTuple!(a, b) = [4, 5].tuple;
Why not to integrate this "let" to phobos, that seems to be a lot of syntactic noise compared to : let (a, b) = [4, 5]; -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can try the best you can If you try the best you can The best you can is good enough