On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 18:41:04 +0000, weaselcat wrote: > On Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 17:57:35 UTC, ketmar wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 14:28:00 +0000, Russel Winder via >> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: >> >>> It could be argued that it is all just co-routines underneath, >>> but I think that would be missing the point that we have 55 years more >>> experience of doing these things since that single processor operating >>> system model was created. We really should be doing this all a lot >>> better these days. >> >> yet current CPUs are still the same as 50 years before, that is the >> problem. ;-) > > heavily disagree
it's still good old "me dumb computer bip bip" with all that low-level register crap and so on. it doesn't matter how much advanced current designs are in their cores, 'cause we -- as users -- see the same old bip- bip shit.
Description: PGP signature