On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 18:41:04 +0000, weaselcat wrote:

> On Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 17:57:35 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 14:28:00 +0000, Russel Winder via
>> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>>> It could be argued that it is all just co-routines underneath,
>>> but I think that would be missing the point that we have 55 years more
>>> experience of doing these things since that single processor operating
>>> system model was created. We really should be doing this all a lot
>>> better these days.
>> yet current CPUs are still the same as 50 years before, that is the
>> problem. ;-)
> heavily disagree

it's still good old "me dumb computer bip bip" with all that low-level 
register crap and so on. it doesn't matter how much advanced current 
designs are in their cores, 'cause we -- as users -- see the same old bip-
bip shit.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to