On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 17:10:31 +0000, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: > > . Separate compilation. One file changes, only one file gets > > rebuilt > > This immediately has caught my eye as huge "no" in the > description. We must ban C style separate compilation, there is > simply no way to move forward otherwise. At the very least not > endorse it in any way.
Why? Other than the -fversion=... stuff, what is really blocking this? I personally find unity builds to not be worth it, but I don't see anything blocking separate compilation for D if dependencies are set up properly. --Ben