On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:21:51 -0800, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> Making it an application that is part of the build > rather than a plug in to ldc would make it available to both dmd and gdc > users, no? And it would sidestep issues where I run dstep on one platform and try to use the results on another, but some #defines are incorrect for the second platform. Of course, that's true for any build-time conversion scheme. Running dstep as part of a build would be equivalent. In terms of practicality, I'd sooner turn to CastXML. It's easier to inspect than clang AST.
