On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 14:49:16 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 14:25:44 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
The wrapper could be smaller with an alias this:

[... snip ...]

even if I'm not 100% sure if this is conform with previous version. At least the tests pass.

I'm surprised that one passes the test,

   static assert(!isForwardRange!SafeRNG);

... ? Or did you only try the tests applied to the dxorshift generators?

I confirm that all of them are run. As in your original paste. All pass, 100% coverage. No problem. Anyway, NVM I should just take care of my own buisness...


  • dxorshift: random numbe... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: dxorshift: ran... Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: dxorshift:... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: dxorsh... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: dx... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: dx... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • R... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to