On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 06:21:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/27/16 10:17 PM, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
On Friday, 27 May 2016 at 18:10:59 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 19:00:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Have I gone completely mad?!?!

Yes, though what does it have to do with this thread? :D

This is by far the most appealing way to implement named arguments
that I've seen so far:


This is very nice... way more clean than I imagined possible.

s/args/make/g and we have a nice function for std.conv. -- Andrei

Do I gather from that that you propose adding only the overload that creates structs?

Reply via email to