On 6/3/2017 5:20 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:06:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/3/2017 12:28 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
Personally, making contracts less verbose and more powerful is much higher on my list
We did discuss bouncing the DIP back with a request to revamp it as a complete overhaul of the contract syntax, but decided that this DIP was about resolving a simple and immediate problem, and it shouldn't be held up on that basis.


There's currently a proposal in the PR queue to enhance the contract syntax.

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/66

I know. That's as it should be!

Reply via email to