On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 10:13:33 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I know that there are efforts towards @nogc exceptions but I think @nogc should somehow related only to the normal operation of code. Since exceptions are for error cases, perhaps they shouldn't have an effect on whether a function is @nogc.

This strikes me as making a lot of sense. You can compare it to the @system, @trusted and @safe trio, where @system is the default and @trusted could be verbosely translated as @unsafe_code_that_is_acceptable_to_be_called_in_safe_code_as_an_exception_to_the_rule.

Transferring this to GC, you could have @gc (the default), @nogc (the @safe equivalent) and the @trusted equivalent: @gc_code_that_is_acceptable_to_be_called_in_nogc_code_as_an_exception_to_the_rule. I'll abbreviate this as @gc78 until there is a better name.

With this, exceptions can be defined to be @gc78 to make them work in @nogc code: As exceptions are exceptional, one can argue that it is OK for them to do exceptional things.

Also, you can write a debugging function that uses string concatenation and writeln inside a DebugCondition, mark it as @gc78 and you'll still be able to call it in @nogc code. This won't cause collection in release versions.


Reply via email to