On 11 December 2017 at 21:15, Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-announce
<digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> ## Linux debugger
> I think it's a bad idea.
> 1. because of the 3 months. Would it be usable despite of being an
> interesting for the student ?
> 2. what will it do better than GDB ?
> 3. I.Buclaw is the official maintainer for the D support in GDB, so why not
> doing something in GDB instead (yeah but what... )

There are still things that GDB supports, but DMD doesn't generate
proper debug info in order to leverage it.

Reply via email to