On 11 December 2017 at 21:15, Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-announce <email@example.com> wrote: > ## Linux debugger > > I think it's a bad idea. > > 1. because of the 3 months. Would it be usable despite of being an > interesting for the student ? > 2. what will it do better than GDB ? > 3. I.Buclaw is the official maintainer for the D support in GDB, so why not > doing something in GDB instead (yeah but what... ) >
There are still things that GDB supports, but DMD doesn't generate proper debug info in order to leverage it.