On Friday, 5 January 2018 at 15:44:57 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 03:38:45PM +0000, Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Friday, 5 January 2018 at 15:22:01 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Very nice to see this taking shape. What's the link to the > code again?


Thanks! Will take a look sometime. Might throw in a PR or two if I can.


Well hold off on that for a day because I just realized I have to redesign the internals of the whole thing due to a bug I found.

Long story short, I'd been using a myriad of different types (depending on your chosen precision) to represent the coefficient in order to avoid the slowness of BigInt. But I realized due to a bug that this isn't really a workable solution.

I'm going to change the code to always use a BigInt, and just work on making BigInt faster where I can. This will make the Decimal code about half as complex thankfully.

Reply via email to