On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 19:47:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-02-12 17:49, Chris wrote:
How could it possibly make the situation any worse than it is
now? Atm,
nobody will ever use std.xml, because it is sub-standard and
has no future.
I'm using std.xml in a new project right now. It's a really
small private project that just need to extracts some data from
an XML document. I started it a couple of days before dxml was
announced.
A few lines of code that could be replaced easily once something
better is available? But who will start an important commercial
project with std.xml when it says in red letters:
"Warning: This module is considered out-dated and not up to
Phobos' current standards. It will remain until we have a
suitable replacement, but be aware that it will not remain long
term."
I for my part wouldn't and I'm glad there's dxml now.
