On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 14:54:48 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Just because something is 'good enough' does not make it 'good enough' for Phobos. In the words of Andrei "Good enough is not good enough", we need to aim higher to show what we actually can do.

About 5 years ago (I think, I actually have the link on my other computer but it is 2,000 miles away right now), Andrei said something along the lines of "without the review process, we get junk like std.json".

Ironically, that same review process may be why we still have such "junk". (actually personally, I don't hate std.json).

If std.xml is really so bad and has been for so long, surely we ought to take an opportunity to change that, even if the change isn't perfect.

Reply via email to