On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 11:19:59 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 23 April 2018 at 20:40:47 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 23 April 2018 at 07:27, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d-announce <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Saturday, 21 April 2018 at 18:11:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 21 April 2018 at 05:41, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d-announce
<[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
Sure.
I thought about generating D wrappers for everything, but in
TDD fashion I tried slapping a pragma(mangle) on the copy
constructor and things just worked. Odd then that dmd doesn't
try to correctly mangle constructors and destructors since
they're perfectly callable.
[...]
This is very cool. Is it possible to fix the mangling issues in
DMD for Copy constructors and destructors? It seems like it would
be less code for dpp, and better C++ interop for D in general.
