On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 12:27:30 UTC, Uknown wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 11:19:59 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 23 April 2018 at 20:40:47 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 23 April 2018 at 07:27, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d-announce <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Saturday, 21 April 2018 at 18:11:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 21 April 2018 at 05:41, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d-announce
<[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
Sure.
I thought about generating D wrappers for everything, but in
TDD fashion I tried slapping a pragma(mangle) on the copy
constructor and things just worked. Odd then that dmd doesn't
try to correctly mangle constructors and destructors since
they're perfectly callable.
[...]
This is very cool.
Thanks!
Is it possible to fix the mangling issues in DMD for Copy
constructors and destructors?
Yes. And I'm going to have to (see below).
It seems like it would be less code for dpp,
Eh, it'd be a tiny change.
and better C++ interop for D in general.
Well, that's the real issue. There are C++ mangling bugs in the
dmd frontend, and they need to be fixed because of templates.
They don't have a mangling until they're instantiated, and I
can't know that ahead of time where the templates are being
declared. The easiest way to move forward is to just fix the dmd
frontend. Unless I come up with some crazy idea. Which I wouldn't
put past me.
Atila
