Re: Wed Oct 17 - Avoiding Code Smells by Walter Bright

[12345swordy via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 at 13:39:25 UTC, rikki cattermole 
wrote:
On 01/11/2018 2:35 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 at 13:28:54 UTC, rikki 
cattermole wrote:
On 01/11/2018 2:25 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
[...]

Because it is.

My rules (which tend to be a little stricter than most 
peoples) are:

Soft split 1k LOC, hard split 3k LOC without a very good 
reason not to.

But at the end of the day, it just depends on the scope of 
the module. Is it getting to large? If so, split.
Ok, you agree that it is subjective. Why is having more then 
one class per file "too large"?

It doesn't. It is a group of related symbols. If it doesn't 
have function bodies (e.g. extern(C++) or COM) I would call 
that module to have too small of a scope.
Why do anyone have to create a file for every class if they 
wanted them to be encapsulated then? Why can't we put them in the 
same file if they are relativity small?