Re: DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is

[Johannes Loher via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 at 11:25:06 UTC, aliak wrote:

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 at 10:40:11 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:

does not work). But I admit that it is still a bit weird to have 2 different defaults.

Is that any more or less weirder than having functions inferred with different attributes based on context?

What exactly are you referring to?