http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3170
Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #7 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2009-07-15 06:46:27 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > You also changed the version to 1.045. I am reverting it back to 2.031 as > > this > > has the most up to date forward reference implementation > > No, the policy here is that > - we set the _oldest_ version in which the bug has been witnessed That turns out to be completely useless, actually. It'd be _so_ much better if there were only 3 versions: 1.x, 2.x, both. For one thing, it means that any search for "1.x bugs" becomes invalid every time there's a new compiler version! And the exact version number is relevant only when there's a regression. And that's handled better by a comment, anyway. > - if a bug exists in both 1.x and 2.x, the 1.x version is set That used to work well, when the compilers were almost identical. We're now getting a lot of bugs which are 1.x only. You're right about it being the policy, but it's actually not a helpful policy at all. (OTOH, updating the version number to the most recent DMD is *really* bad). Adding keywords is extremely helpful. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------