http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1449
--- Comment #11 from Stewart Gordon <[email protected]> 2011-06-16 06:45:09 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) >> I agree with Bearophile. Moreover, as I see it, a hole in the deprecation >> system constitutes a bug, just as most of us seem to agree that a hole in the >> const/immutable system (of which there are many) constitutes a bug. >> > > To quote the spec: The spec is in itself a place where bugs may exist. Indeed, it's where many of the bugs in const/immutable are or have been. >> It is often necessary to deprecate a feature in a library, yet >> retain it for backwards compatibility. Such declarations can be >> marked as deprecated, which > means that the compiler can be set >> to produce an error if any code refers to deprecated declarations > > Where is the code referring to a deprecated declaration? class Foo : Bar { ^^^^^ It's an indirect reference, but it's still essentially there. (In reply to comment #9) > Walter has clarified that this is intentional, and therefore not a > bug. Where and how? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
