http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7515
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-03-11 13:53:26 PDT --- I have thought some more about this and I have changed my mind: there is no point to artificially restrict the usefulness of this function. So I suggest: 1) To not use a opaque struct, but leave the simple translation array. 2) To use a translation array of 256 items. So translate is usable for an ubyte[] array input too (with a cast of the ubyte[] to char[] in the function call if necessary). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
