http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857
--- Comment #67 from Stewart Gordon <[email protected]> 2012-05-07 10:48:26 PDT --- (In reply to comment #62) > Changing how the language work must be done only if strong arguments are made. Unless I've missed something, the language leaves this unspecified. So a compiler is free to do it either way. Though it would be better if it were specified. > Providing documentation on language design decision is surely a way to improve > the current state of things. Indeed, if all rationales scattered about the D docs were collected in one place, and a few more that we ought to have were added, I wonder how big this section would be. FTR, look at the PNG rationale page.... http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/spec/1.2/PNG-Rationale.html -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
