On Friday, 1 January 2021 at 15:01:15 UTC, RSY wrote:
one big move would be to finally put the allocators out of std.experimental, and finally embrace this everywhere (just like ziglang)

I am bit torn on this, the less the compiler knows about allocation strategies, the less opportunity there are for the compiler to be smart about allocations. So, those things ought to be language constructs, not library constructs.

At least if D is going to stay in the lane of high level programming. (Zig is firmly staking ground in the manual-labour department, as far as I can tell.)

              • Re:... RSY via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Imperatorn via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Imperatorn via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... RSY via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... SealabJaster via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... SealabJaster via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Imperatorn via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • Re:... Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-learn
  • Re: C++ or D? Imperatorn via Digitalmars-d-learn

Reply via email to