On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 10:16:47 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 08:15:37 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
My point is you know you're just picky.
Well.. it seems to me, that your 'point' is to just have a go
at me.
In any case, there is nothing 'picky' about wanting to be able
to explicately 'declare' a member of my class type as being
private. That to me, is what a programmer should expect to be
able to do in a language that says it supports OOP.
Further nonsense towards me will be ignored ;-)
fight fight fight fight
jk
