On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 20:34:13 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 20:06:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 07:13:41 UTC,
thebluepandabear wrote:
Time to move on to OCaml programmers telling us D doesn't
have floating point arithmetic because there's no `+.`
operator.
that's not the same thing though, you've created a great
false equivalence! Congrats.
Only if you don't understand D's encapsulation. You're going
on at length (apparently under multiple names in this thread)
because you don't like D's implementation of encapsulation.
That's no different from complaining that the `+` operator
should be `+.`, and until D makes the change, it doesn't
support floating point addition.
There are reasonable arguments for changing and not changing
D's implementation of encapsulation. Your claim that D doesn't
support encapsulation is false.
'under multiple names'... You can clearly see I have the same
name, simply different profile pictures.
You should know by now, that anyone that supports the idea of D
providing an explicit mechanism to support data hiding for a
user-defined type, are all the **same** person.
Nobody else in the world supports such an idea.
It's all just one person... apparently ;-)
