On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 02:14:30 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 01:16:00 UTC,
thebluepandabear wrote:
I think what you could say is that D lacks _encapsulation_
which is also an OOP concept. So D is partially OOP but not
fully OOP due to there being no encapsulation in the language.
D does not lack encapsulation, it's just that the unit of
encapsulation is the module. Everything private in a module is
encapsulated from the perspective of the public API.
If you really want to prevent anything inside a module from
accessing the private parts of a class, you can put the class
in its own module.
Must we continue beating this horse?
Time to move on to OCaml programmers telling us D doesn't have
floating point arithmetic because there's no `+.` operator.
