Re: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[zjh via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 22:25:22 UTC, ProtectAndHide 
wrote:

also, I noticed that you intentionally? did not respond to the 
facts that I outlined:

ie.


They can't refute you, so they have to blame you.
You can't wake up who pretend to sleep.