On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:04:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I strictly believe any unittest enhancing library must be built on top of existing unittest blocks using __traits(getUnittest) and be 100% compatible with normal `-unittest` mode
I don't disagree. What exactly does that mean and what would it look like?
I'm not familiar with __traits(getUnittest). Is that something that could/should be used in what I'm doing?
What I'm missing, and apparently others in the original thread, is a way to run tests selectively. It is difficult to do with unittest because they are not named. If there were a way to annotate the test and pull them out that way it would be great. Can it be done?
