On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:53:04 +0000, bachmeier wrote: > On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 00:33:44 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: >> This might change, but that's a gamble, and not one I'd take. >> For projects where you need specific libraries to exist already, D >> probably won't serve your needs. (It's definitely easier with C++ >> interop, but you'd still have to write bindings. htod doesn't exactly >> work on Linux.) > > Does anyone still use htod? I thought dstep was the tool being used to > generate bindings.
dstep doesn't work out of the box. A simple `dub run dstep` results in compilation errors.