On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 05:05:22 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 04:51:39 UTC, Matt Elkins wrote:
- Syntactic sugars (associtive arrays, powerful foreach, slices...)

I'm still adjusting to the idea of AAs as part of the language rather than library. Not sure I like it, but on the other hand it doesn't really hurt. The foreach construct isn't any better (or worse) than C++'s, unless I'm missing something (which is very possible). But slices are awesome!

In D you can `foreach` over a list of types (AliasSeq) at compile time, not just over ranges at runtime. (For the moment, it's still only available in function bodies though, unlike `static if`.)

Neat! I didn't know that. You can do that in C++, but in typical fashion not with a convenient foreach statement. You have to do some crazy type list recursion stuff.

So chalk up another point for D's "ease of metaprogramming" :).

Reply via email to