On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 20:29:51 UTC, deXtoRious wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 19:19:23 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
The "One language to rule them all" motif of Julia has hit the rocks; one reason is because they now realize that their language is being held back because the compiler cannot infer certain types for example: http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/notebook/2015/11/28/why-julias-dataframes-are-still-slow/

As an avid user of Julia, I'm going to have to disagree very strongly with this statement. The language is progressing very nicely and while it doesn't aim to be the best choice for every programming task imaginable...

Ahem (http://www.wired.com/2014/02/julia/), I'm not saying that the Julia founders approved that title, we all know how the press can inflate things, but there was a certain rhetoric that Julia was creating something super-special that would change everything.


Reply via email to