On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 19:30:01 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
It doesn't even make conceptual sense for a static array to be
a range, because you can't remove elements from it.
- Jonathan M Davis
Interestingly enough, I found that using .each() actually
compiles without the [] but (as expected) creates a copy... So,
these output different values:
thing.each!((ref x) => writeln(&x));
thing[].each!((ref x) => writeln(&x));
Should there me a more consistent behavior here? Even if the
behavior is pretty undesired, why can the compiler consider it a
range here but not .sort()?
