Matt Gamble wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 21:02:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 03/07/2018 09:09 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
----
double f() { return 1; }
void main()
{
cast(void) f();
cast(void) f();
cast(void) f();
cast(void) f();
cast(void) f();
cast(void) f();
cast(void) f();
double b = 2;
assert(b == 2); /* fails; should pass */
}
----
With `real` instead of `double` x86_64 is also affected.
Wow. Good to know I'm not crazy. I was afk for a bit, sorry. I guess I'm
glad I found it and posted. The conversation has gone beyond my realm of
understanding. Has anyone tested on 2.079 like Ali wanted. I have not had
a chance to install. I was going to wait to post the bug till that was
tried.
sure, it is still there in git HEAD. it is not the bug that can be fixed
"accidentally". %-)