On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 at 00:48:03 UTC, Joe wrote:
I'd like to know if the lack of double/float versions of 'log',
'log10', etc. are intentional, i.e., there's some rationale
behind it, or an oversight.
Just laziness or people still thinking that you don't lose any
performance by computing in `real` precision.
[ldc2 also reports
test.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression & tan of
type real function(real x) pure nothrow @nogc @trusted to
but apparently this is an LDC-only problem]
You've got to be using an older LDC version; v1.12 does define
tan() for all 3 FP types.
I'd also like to know the proper/best way to deal with the error
Long-term? Definitely adding the missing implementations to
std.math ;), continuing my work here:
Short-term, I'd go with tiny wrappers.