I think we should have -future/-f switch and @future attribute. It is a rough idea, but seems a required compiler feature.
Kenji Hara 2012/12/14 Walter Bright <[email protected]> > On 12/13/2012 5:33 PM, kenji hara wrote: > >> Yet not released feature is not visible for almost D users. >> What you are going to do in 2.061 is to add a warned feature suddenly. >> >> But, it is certainly no problem for almost D users (unless users use old >> @[] >> syntax, compiler never warn). I think what you must to do is to cut the >> time >> limit of removing @[] syntax. X months after? In version 2.0yy? >> You should say much better answer than *in the future*. >> > > I think in the past we've been too hasty sometimes in removing things. I > think a better approach will be to allow some time to elapse, and then ask > in the ng if there will be any problems with moving to the next stage. > >
