On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 23:41:32 UTC, RenatoUtsch wrote:
Please, lets not release something not thoroughly tested when we are in the middle of the new development process discussion, we are trying to avoid exactly this kind of thing.
The process must be defined before we can use it and UDA has already missed that boat. I'm in agreement with the way Andrei has said it, we need to let this slide.
Even if the feature is not introducing backwards incompatible changes, this will cause problems when we discover, in the future, that we made some bad decision and won't be able to change it anymore.
Hopefully we are defining the process that we can handle these changes. We'll never have enough testing to not make this mistake.
So let us go make this process for Walter to follow and neg him later. (You don't throw people in jail when what they did was criminalized a year later)
