On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 14:53:49 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 14:25:18 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 January 2013 at 23:39:50 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
We need a good DIP on this. UFCS has destroyed all arguments
in favor of requiring parens. There is no question we must do
this. Anyone inclined toward writing a detailed DIP?
Let me strongly disagree. Language feature should never be
introduced where library solution is possible.
C has strings as a concept and C++ as a library solution. Which
strings are better: C, C++ or D?
D string string is not builtin. string is merely a thing in D.
D have builtin slices, which is a generic feature that is used
with whatever you want.
