On 1/24/13 2:26 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:30:46 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/24/13 4:28 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
We actually have one, which I think I agree with:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP21
Walter convinced me last night that eliminating @property is more sensible.
Well, that's bad news. It's bad enough that @property hasn't been properly
sorted out, but getting rid of it completely disregards the problems that it's
trying to solve. Getting rid of @property would be a horrible move IMHO.
No, the idea is to use better inference for the cases in which @property
would be appropriate.
So we are looking at _changing_ the language, not simply ignoring @property.
Andrei
