Am Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:26:25 +0100 schrieb "Jonathan M Davis" <[email protected]>:
> On Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:30:46 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > > On 1/24/13 4:28 AM, monarch_dodra wrote: > > > We actually have one, which I think I agree with: > > > http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP21 > > > > Walter convinced me last night that eliminating @property is more > > sensible. > > Well, that's bad news. It's bad enough that @property hasn't been > properly sorted out, but getting rid of it completely disregards the > problems that it's trying to solve. Getting rid of @property would be > a horrible move IMHO. > > - Jonathan M Davis Especially as it means that we have to deprecate @property first and it'll probably stay around for at least another year.
